All posts by Marcos

When misleading lines are drawn

shimamuraMuch of Hutton and Kelly’s unfortunate review of Shimamura’s Experiencing art rests on a biased and misguided image of the current cognitive neuroscience of aesthetics. The reviewers’ first grievance is that the book fails to “play a critical role in establishing neuroaesthetics as a subject worth taking seriously”. Such an expectation—unreasonable for a clearly introductory book—only reveals the extent to which they disregard a large body of work on the neural basis of aesthetic and art appreciation whose worth has long been taken seriously, from Burke to our days.

As the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetics has gained momentum, scientists have engaged philosophers, artists and art historians in lively arguments. Contrary to Hutton and Kelly’s hyperbolic caricature of “territorial squabbles”, such encounters have mostly taken the form of enriching scholarly discussions. They make their case by overlooking recent collaborations between artists, architects, philosophers, art historians, psychologists, and neuroscientists to understand the nature of artistic and aesthetic appreciation. They even neglect to mention the book Aesthetic Science, a volume coedited by Shimamura himself, the first third of which is devoted to philosophical perspectives.

Finally, Hutton and Kelly support their views with philosopher Alva Noë’s reproach of neuroaesthetics for not having shown anything interesting or surprising about art. But why should neuroaesthetics be judged on the basis of how well it answers philosophical questions about art? Art poses a wealth of different questions. Some are philosophical and others are historical. Yet, others have to do with the biological underpinnings of the cognitive and emotional processes involved in the creation and appreciation of art. And these are the questions the cognitive neuroscience of art has set out to answer. Some philosophers may find such issues uninteresting, but does this mean that they are less worthy of scientific research?

William_James_Reading

Hutton and Kelly call for responsible advocates for the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetics, but there is an equally pressing need for responsible commentators, who keep up to date with the field’s progress, who are able to make their case without building straw men, and avoid judging the whole field based on unrepresentative hand-picked instances. Shimamura’s volume constitutes another stepping-stone for the cognitive neuroscience of aesthetics. Its service is to be improved upon, just as William James thought of his own book The Principles of Psychology: “A great chance for some future psychologue to make a greater name than Newton’s, but who then will read the books of this generation? Not many, I throw. Meanwhile they must be written”.

Marcos Nadal & Helmut Leder

2014 Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics

The 2014 Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (IAEA) will be held in New York City from August 22-24, 2014.

The 2014 IAEA Congress is an opportunity for researchers and scholars from different domains and countries to present and share empirical research on aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of the arts. Submissions may address questions concerning: aesthetic perception, appreciation, emotion, experience, and judgment; the creative process in various media and domains; cultural studies; musicology; art historical perspectives on aesthetics and creativity; architectural and design studies; museology; philosophical, theoretical, and methodological issues in aesthetics research; and others.

Detailed information about the Congress venues, program, submission guidelines, registration, travel, and accommodations may be found on the official Congress website: http://iaea2014.weebly.com/

Congress Organizing Committee: Aaron Kozbelt (Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center), Paul Locher (Montclair State University), Pablo Tinio (Queens College)

Questions about the 2014 Congress should be emailed to: iaeacongress2014@gmail.com

For more information about IAEA, please visit: http://www.science-of-aesthetics.org

Call for papers here

FSU College of Medicine Recruitment in Neuroscience

The College of Medicine at Florida State University is currently reviewing applicants for 9 new positions in neuroscience.  Lauren S. Weingarden, PhD (Professor of Art History at the Department of Art History) is serving in a consulting capacity for identifying candidates who engage in neuroaesthetics research. Of the these positions, one is for an endowed chair and the others are open  to all ranks.

The positions are aimed at interdisciplinary faculty in the broadly defined area of mechanistic and translational approaches to brain health and disease. What is especially important for a candidate interested in developing neuroaesthetics research at FSU is that there is material and collegial support for researchers conducting cognitive, behavioral, social and developmental neuroscience as well as computational, bio-informatic, specialized imaging, and genetic approaches to studying brain health and disease.  Equally important (and exciting), the College will be acquiring an fMRI scanner.

Lauren S. Weingarden, PhD  [lweingarden@fsu.edu

Professor of Art History / Department of Art History

http://arthistory.fsu.edu/People/Faculty/Faculty/Lauren-S.-Weingarden
1019 William Johnston Building / Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306 – 1233 / Main office phone: 850.644.1250